Atypical chronic myelomonocytic leukemia of eosinophilic lineage in a FeLV-positive cat
Case reports in veterinary medicine · 2026
In plain language
The report describes a two-year-old cat with a positive FeLV test and an unusual form of leukemia, diagnosed through blood and bone marrow studies. The case did not fit the usual classification criteria. The cat died two days after diagnosis, but this single case cannot predict outcomes for other cats or attribute the death specifically to FeLV. It also does not show that FeLV caused the leukemia.
Scientific detail
This clinical report, published in Case reports in veterinary medicine in 2026 (doi: 10.1155/crve/6729159), describes a two-year-old cat with a positive FeLV test. The authors diagnosed atypical chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) of eosinophilic lineage through bone marrow examination and peripheral blood studies. The findings constitute level C evidence from a single case, with no reported control group; they do not independently validate a feline disease classification.
The authors reported diffuse alpha-naphthyl acetate esterase positivity in 21.3% of cells whose morphology appeared compatible with myeloid/neutrophilic lineage. They used cytochemistry to support monocytic identity despite that morphology. This single observation does not establish diagnostic sensitivity or specificity. Morphologically eosinophilic cells accounted for 45.4% of marrow cells and were negative for both myeloperoxidase and alpha-naphthyl acetate esterase. Lineage attribution in this finding is morphological: the negative stains do not independently establish eosinophilic clonality or an underlying genetic lesion.
The authors considered the case atypical because hypereosinophilia in blood and marrow prevented it from fitting classic WHO criteria. Separately tabulated blood and marrow blast percentages and serial measurements documenting persistent monocytosis were not reported. Karyotyping was not performed because the cat died two days after diagnosis, leaving chromosomal characterization unavailable. This observed survival cannot establish a general prognosis or attribute death specifically to FeLV.
Although the authors describe the leukemia as secondary to FeLV, the reported evidence documents the co-occurrence of a positive infection test and a myeloid neoplasm in one cat. No causal experiments, molecular analyses, or integration-site investigations linking FeLV to malignant transformation were reported. The case therefore does not establish that FeLV caused this leukemia or identify an oncogenic mechanism.
What we know
In a two-year-old cat with a positive FeLV test, the authors diagnosed atypical CMML of eosinophilic lineage from blood and bone marrow studies. The morphological and cytochemical findings are level C evidence limited to that case. The authors explicitly noted that hypereosinophilia prevented the case from fitting classic WHO criteria.
What we don't know
This case does not determine whether FeLV caused the leukemia or through what mechanism. Karyotyping was unavailable, and no molecular or integration-site studies were reported. Separately tabulated blood and marrow blast percentages and serial measurements documenting persistent monocytosis were also not reported. Eosinophilic clonality, an underlying genetic lesion, diagnostic sensitivity or specificity, independent validity of the feline classification, and a generalizable prognosis remain unestablished. The death cannot be attributed specifically to FeLV on the basis of this case.
Evidence
EvidenceLevel C — Preliminary evidenceConfidence 100/100
The authors diagnosed atypical CMML of eosinophilic lineage from bone marrow examination and peripheral blood studies.
Excerpt verified in the source — verbatim, in the source's own language“Based on the findings obtained from bone marrow examination along with peripheral blood studies, a diagnosis of atypical CMML of the eosinophilic lineage is concluded.”
This is the reported diagnosis in one cat, not independent validation of a feline disease classification or demonstration of a FeLV-driven oncogenic mechanism.
EvidenceLevel C — Preliminary evidenceConfidence 100/100
The authors reported diffuse alpha-naphthyl acetate esterase positivity in 21.3% of cells that appeared morphologically compatible with myeloid/neutrophilic lineage.
Excerpt verified in the source — verbatim, in the source's own language“Then, 21.3% of cells that were morphologically compatible with myeloid/neutrophilic lineage were positive in a diffuse pattern to alpha‐naphthyl acetate esterase.”
The authors used cytochemistry to support monocytic identity in cells with misleading morphology. This single-case observation does not establish diagnostic sensitivity or specificity.
EvidenceLevel C — Preliminary evidenceConfidence 100/100
Morphologically eosinophilic cells constituted 45.4% of medullary cells and were negative for both myeloperoxidase and alpha-naphthyl acetate esterase.
Excerpt verified in the source — verbatim, in the source's own language“Atypical observation includes 45.4% of medullary cells belonging to the eosinophilic lineage (morphologically), which are negative for myeloperoxidase and alpha‐naphthyl acetate esterase by enzymatic cytochemical methods.”
The lineage attribution in this passage is morphological. The negative stains do not independently establish eosinophilic clonality or an underlying genetic lesion.
EvidenceLevel C — Preliminary evidenceConfidence 100/100
The authors considered the case atypical because hypereosinophilia in blood and marrow prevented it from fitting classic WHO criteria.
Excerpt verified in the source — verbatim, in the source's own language“It should be emphasized that in this specific case, hypereosinophilia was observed in both blood and marrow, which causes this patient′s classification to not fit the classic WHO criteria and should be considered atypical.”
This records the authors' explicit classification caveat rather than presenting the diagnosis as an unambiguous fit to conventional criteria.
EvidenceLevel C — Preliminary evidenceConfidence 100/100
Karyotyping was not performed because the cat died 2 days after diagnosis.
Excerpt verified in the source — verbatim, in the source's own language“In this case, karyotyping was not possible because the patient died 2 days after diagnosis.”
Chromosomal characterization was unavailable. The short observed survival cannot establish a general prognosis or attribute death specifically to FeLV.
InferenceConfidence 98/100
This case does not establish that FeLV caused the reported leukemia.
Although the authors describe the leukemia as secondary to FeLV, the reported evidence consists of infection-test positivity and a concurrent neoplasm in one cat, without a reported causal experiment or molecular analysis linking FeLV to malignant transformation.
Provenance
Source: Chronic Atypical Myelomonocytic Leukemia of Eosinophilic Lineage in a Cat With Feline Leukemia Virus: A First Case Report.